<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lilly Gets Deferred II: More Lessons for Girls From the College Application Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2010/01/lilly-gets-deferred-ii-more-lessons-for-girls-from-the-college-application-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2010/01/lilly-gets-deferred-ii-more-lessons-for-girls-from-the-college-application-process/</link>
	<description>Leadership for Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:08:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2010/01/lilly-gets-deferred-ii-more-lessons-for-girls-from-the-college-application-process/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelsimmons.com/?p=2048#comment-440</guid>
		<description>ps. sorry for the typos. *can&#039;t *pathetically</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps. sorry for the typos. *can&#8217;t *pathetically</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilly</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2010/01/lilly-gets-deferred-ii-more-lessons-for-girls-from-the-college-application-process/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelsimmons.com/?p=2048#comment-337</guid>
		<description>Suzie, 
I&#039;m so glad you are enjoying the blogs! I think girls may personalize criticism more than boys do because so much of being a girl depends on relationships. When relationships are paramount, every interaction begins to feel personal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suzie,<br />
I&#8217;m so glad you are enjoying the blogs! I think girls may personalize criticism more than boys do because so much of being a girl depends on relationships. When relationships are paramount, every interaction begins to feel personal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzie M.</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2010/01/lilly-gets-deferred-ii-more-lessons-for-girls-from-the-college-application-process/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzie M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelsimmons.com/?p=2048#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Lilly,

I look forward to reading your blog every week!  Regarding the &quot;constructive criticism&quot; part... I think that the college admissions process is so hard because you rarely get feedback from colleges about WHY you didn&#039;t get in.  It&#039;s easier in many respects to get a bad grade, because it&#039;s often obvious (maybe after the fact) why you got the grade you did.  Even if someone breaks up with you, you&#039;ll often get a reason why (maybe not always a truthful one, but an answer nonetheless).  But, to my knowledge, colleges don&#039;t send back a letter saying *why* you were deferred or not accepted.  

Also -- and this is admittedly a big generalization -- my experience is that girls tend to personalize criticism more than boys (getting a bad grade means I&#039;m a bad PERSON, not just a struggling math student, and my teacher now HATES me).  

Anyway, I just wanted to write a comment -- look forward to reading next week!  

Suzie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lilly,</p>
<p>I look forward to reading your blog every week!  Regarding the &#8220;constructive criticism&#8221; part&#8230; I think that the college admissions process is so hard because you rarely get feedback from colleges about WHY you didn&#8217;t get in.  It&#8217;s easier in many respects to get a bad grade, because it&#8217;s often obvious (maybe after the fact) why you got the grade you did.  Even if someone breaks up with you, you&#8217;ll often get a reason why (maybe not always a truthful one, but an answer nonetheless).  But, to my knowledge, colleges don&#8217;t send back a letter saying *why* you were deferred or not accepted.  </p>
<p>Also &#8212; and this is admittedly a big generalization &#8212; my experience is that girls tend to personalize criticism more than boys (getting a bad grade means I&#8217;m a bad PERSON, not just a struggling math student, and my teacher now HATES me).  </p>
<p>Anyway, I just wanted to write a comment &#8212; look forward to reading next week!  </p>
<p>Suzie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Simmons</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2010/01/lilly-gets-deferred-ii-more-lessons-for-girls-from-the-college-application-process/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelsimmons.com/?p=2048#comment-332</guid>
		<description>I think part of the &quot;life isn&#039;t fair&quot; lesson is realizing that not everything is YOUR fault. Sometimes stuff happens, and it has nothing to do with how hard you worked or didn&#039;t. I think you are already saying this but I want to make the point more clear. So...it&#039;s not all about us Good Girl -- things don&#039;t rise and fall on our work. Sometimes, annoying circumstances intervene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the &#8220;life isn&#8217;t fair&#8221; lesson is realizing that not everything is YOUR fault. Sometimes stuff happens, and it has nothing to do with how hard you worked or didn&#8217;t. I think you are already saying this but I want to make the point more clear. So&#8230;it&#8217;s not all about us Good Girl &#8212; things don&#8217;t rise and fall on our work. Sometimes, annoying circumstances intervene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catbus</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2010/01/lilly-gets-deferred-ii-more-lessons-for-girls-from-the-college-application-process/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Catbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 23:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelsimmons.com/?p=2048#comment-331</guid>
		<description>I once gave this advice to a former student who was starting his college search:

Aim high. Aim even higher than you think is reasonable. Really, what have you got to lose? If you&#039;d be satisfied with UIC [the University of Illinois at Chicago], apply to the University of California at Berkeley or the University of Texas. If you can see yourself at one of those state schools, take a crack at the University of Chicago. If you think you could handle the University of Chicago, why not Cornell? If you think Cornell is within your reach, go for broke -- Harvard, baby! And if you&#039;re so confident that you know you can get into Harvard with a snap of your fingers . . . dare I suggest Oxford?

Think &quot;1-2-4-2-1&quot;: If you apply to 10 colleges, then make one of them your dream school -- the one you&#039;d choose to attend if you were twice as smart, twice as rich and twice as good-looking. Next choose two schools that you think represent the absolute limits of your academic reach, like the Frisbee that you can catch, just barely, if you leap for it. The next four should be schools that you&#039;re fairly confident that you can get into and fairly certain that you can succeed at, without selling yourself short. Two should be schools that are a little less competitive -- you &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt; you can get in -- but offer something special that would make them worth the tradeoff. And the last one is your safety school, if Murphy&#039;s Law kicks in and everything that can go wrong does.

To give you an example of this strategy, if I woke up tomorrow and were in high school again, here are the 10 colleges I&#039;d apply to: [1] Harvard, [2] University of Chicago, Columbia University, [4] University of California at Berkeley, University of Washington, NYU, Amherst College, [2] St. John&#039;s University, Carleton College, [1] University of Wisconsin at Madison.

If you flat-out can&#039;t afford to apply to 10 colleges, at least apply to six: one dream school, two limit-pushers, two good bets and one safety with something special. Do not let &lt;i&gt;anyone&lt;/i&gt; talk you out of applying to the dream school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once gave this advice to a former student who was starting his college search:</p>
<p>Aim high. Aim even higher than you think is reasonable. Really, what have you got to lose? If you&#8217;d be satisfied with UIC [the University of Illinois at Chicago], apply to the University of California at Berkeley or the University of Texas. If you can see yourself at one of those state schools, take a crack at the University of Chicago. If you think you could handle the University of Chicago, why not Cornell? If you think Cornell is within your reach, go for broke &#8212; Harvard, baby! And if you&#8217;re so confident that you know you can get into Harvard with a snap of your fingers . . . dare I suggest Oxford?</p>
<p>Think &#8220;1-2-4-2-1&#8243;: If you apply to 10 colleges, then make one of them your dream school &#8212; the one you&#8217;d choose to attend if you were twice as smart, twice as rich and twice as good-looking. Next choose two schools that you think represent the absolute limits of your academic reach, like the Frisbee that you can catch, just barely, if you leap for it. The next four should be schools that you&#8217;re fairly confident that you can get into and fairly certain that you can succeed at, without selling yourself short. Two should be schools that are a little less competitive &#8212; you <i>know</i> you can get in &#8212; but offer something special that would make them worth the tradeoff. And the last one is your safety school, if Murphy&#8217;s Law kicks in and everything that can go wrong does.</p>
<p>To give you an example of this strategy, if I woke up tomorrow and were in high school again, here are the 10 colleges I&#8217;d apply to: [1] Harvard, [2] University of Chicago, Columbia University, [4] University of California at Berkeley, University of Washington, NYU, Amherst College, [2] St. John&#8217;s University, Carleton College, [1] University of Wisconsin at Madison.</p>
<p>If you flat-out can&#8217;t afford to apply to 10 colleges, at least apply to six: one dream school, two limit-pushers, two good bets and one safety with something special. Do not let <i>anyone</i> talk you out of applying to the dream school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilly Gets Deferred II: More Lessons for Girls From the College &#8230; College by about</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2010/01/lilly-gets-deferred-ii-more-lessons-for-girls-from-the-college-application-process/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilly Gets Deferred II: More Lessons for Girls From the College &#8230; College by about</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelsimmons.com/?p=2048#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] original here: Lilly Gets Deferred II: More Lessons for Girls From the College &#8230;          By admin &#124; category: college &#124; tags: began-exploring, college, decides-which, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] original here: Lilly Gets Deferred II: More Lessons for Girls From the College &#8230;          By admin | category: college | tags: began-exploring, college, decides-which, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilly Gets Deferred II: More Lessons for Girls From the College &#8230; &#124; girls</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelsimmons.com/2010/01/lilly-gets-deferred-ii-more-lessons-for-girls-from-the-college-application-process/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilly Gets Deferred II: More Lessons for Girls From the College &#8230; &#124; girls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelsimmons.com/?p=2048#comment-327</guid>
		<description>[...] Continue reading here: Lilly Gets Deferred II: More Lessons for Girls From the College ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continue reading here: Lilly Gets Deferred II: More Lessons for Girls From the College &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

